000 | 01458cam a2200181ua 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
020 | _a0415074517 | ||
082 |
_a822.33 _bHAW/M |
||
100 | 0 | _aHawkes, Terence | |
245 | 1 | 0 | _aMeaning by Shakespeare |
260 |
_aLondon _bRoutledge _c1992 |
||
300 | _ax,173p. | ||
520 | _aWe traditionally assume that the `meaning' of each of Shakespeares plays is bequeathed to it by the Bard. It is as if, to the information which used to be given in theatrical programmes, `Cigarettes by Abdullah, Costumes by Motley, Music by Mendelssohn', we should add `Meaning by Shakespeare'. These essays rest on a different, almost opposite, principle. Developing the arguments of the same author's That Shakespearean Rag (1986), they put the case that Shakespeare's plays have no essential meanings, but function as resources which we use to generate meaning. A Midsummer Night's Dream, Measure for Measure, Coriolanus and King Lear, amongst other plays, are examined as concrete instances of the covert process whereby, in the twentieth century, Shakespeare doesn't mean: we mean by Shakespeare. Meaning by Shakespeare concludes with `Bardbiz', a review of recent critical approaches to Shakespeare, which initiated a long-running debate (1990-1991) when it first appeared in The London Review of Books. | ||
650 | _aEnglish literature | ||
650 | 0 | _aShakespeare, William | |
650 | 0 | _aReader-response criticism | |
650 | 0 | _aMeaning (Philosophy) in literature | |
942 | _cBK | ||
999 |
_c3040 _d3040 |