Chaucer's dead body: from corpse to corpus
Material type: TextPublication details: New York Routledge 2003Description: vii,180pISBN: 0415966787Subject(s): English Literature | Literature-Medieval-history and Criticism-theoryDDC classification: 821.1 Summary: "This book is an ingeniously conceived account of the relation between the physical tomb of Chaucer and its place in the development of Chaucerian studies. Along the way, however, this account becomes more than merely ingenious in its excavation of a deeply compelling logic that links memorialization and canon formation. This is, in short, no mere 'Chaucer study.' Prendergast's examination of what is at stake not just in the history of Chaucer's tomb but also in the historiography implicit in Chaucerian criticism and the changing forms and interests of Chaucerian necrology is ultimately a kind of history of English literature, an account of the medievalism's implicit in the assertion of positive and negative literary values from the fifteenth into the twentieth centuries, from Thomas Hoccleve to T.S. Eliot. It should certainly appeal to literary scholars of all historical persuasions, and certainly will appeal to medievalists." -- D. Vance Smith, Princeton UniversityItem type | Current library | Call number | Status | Date due | Barcode |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
BK | Stack | 821.1 PRE/C (Browse shelf (Opens below)) | Available | 14830 |
Browsing Kannur University Central Library shelves, Shelving location: Stack Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)
No cover image available No cover image available | ||||||||
821.09 TOM/E English poetry: from John Donne to Ted Hughes | 821.0924 YES/T T.S. Eliot and the romantic poets | 821.1 PEA/C The Canterbury tales | 821.1 PRE/C Chaucer's dead body: from corpse to corpus | 821.109 CHA Chaucer | 821.109 CHA Chaucer to Houseman: Blake to Housman | 821.109 CHA Chaucer: the Canterbury tales: a casebook |
"This book is an ingeniously conceived account of the relation between the physical tomb of Chaucer and its place in the development of Chaucerian studies. Along the way, however, this account becomes more than merely ingenious in its excavation of a deeply compelling logic that links memorialization and canon formation. This is, in short, no mere 'Chaucer study.' Prendergast's examination of what is at stake not just in the history of Chaucer's tomb but also in the historiography implicit in Chaucerian criticism and the changing forms and interests of Chaucerian necrology is ultimately a kind of history of English literature, an account of the medievalism's implicit in the assertion of positive and negative literary values from the fifteenth into the twentieth centuries, from Thomas Hoccleve to T.S. Eliot. It should certainly appeal to literary scholars of all historical persuasions, and certainly will appeal to medievalists." -- D. Vance Smith, Princeton University
There are no comments on this title.